Processing natural language arguments with the<TextCoop>platform

Processing natural language arguments with the<TextCoop>platform

Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opin...

Natural Language Processing with Python

Natural Language Arguments: A Combined Approach

With the growing use of the Social Web, an increasing number of applications for exchanging opinions with other people are becoming available online. These applications are widely adopted with the consequence that the number of opinions about the debated issues increases. In order to cut in on a debate, the participants need first to evaluate the opinions in favour or against the debated issue....

Towards a Benchmark of Natural Language Arguments

The connections among natural language processing and argumentation theory are becoming stronger in the latest years, with a growing amount of works going in this direction, in different scenarios and applying heterogeneous techniques. In this paper, we present two datasets we built to cope with the combination of the Textual Entailment framework and bipolar abstract argumentation. In our appro...

NoDE: A Benchmark of Natural Language Arguments

In the latest years, natural models of argumentation and argument mining are becoming more and more important topics in the argumentation community. Given this tendency, there is the need to produce standard datasets on which natural language approaches to argumentation can be evaluated. In this paper, we present NoDE, a benchmark of natural language arguments composed of three datasets, built ...